• The Lifeless by Lorne Dixon Now Available!

      0 comments

    The Lifeless by Lorne Dixon is now available at the following on-line retailers:

    Paperback:

    Amazon.com
    Amazon.ca
    Amazon.co.uk
    Barnes and Noble
    Other On-line Retailers

    eBook:

    Amazon Kindle
    Fictionwise.com
    Drivethruhorror.com
    Mobipocket

    The story:

    A school full of kids.

    A mysterious yellow rain.

    High school will never be the same.

    They are outcasts and misfits, teenagers lost on the path to adulthood, living day-to-day inside a high school culture of taunts, humiliation, and isolation. They are the misunderstood, the neglected, and the abused. They are . . . The Lifeless.

    For them, every school day is a nightmare.

    But on Monday, October 2nd, they will discover the true meaning of terror.

    Classes are cut short by news of explosions in the city across the river, part of a series of horrific terrorist attacks that paralyze the nation. But that is only the beginning: amber clouds fill the sky, burning rain pelts down, and the surviving students of Verlaine High learn that their tormentors have mutated into something far worse—reanimated corpses with a primordial instinct for murder.

    It’s time to stand up to the in-crowd . . . or be consumed by it.

    What folks are saying:

    “Lorne Dixon’s The Lifeless is a book no fan of horror should miss. Its darkness will grow and fester in your mind, leaving you with nightmares long after the story is over and the book is closed” – Eric S. Brown, author of The War of the Worlds Plus Blood, Guts and Zombies and World War of the Dead

    “Gooey-zombie goodness, lots of action . . . Dixon’s prose is quick . . . guaranteed to keep you on the edge of your seat.” – Nick Cato, author of Don of the Dead

    Also by Lorne Dixon: Snarl

    The last Coscom Entertainment release: Vicious Verses and Reanimated Rhymes: Zany Zombie Poetry for the Undead Head

    For our full list of books, please see: www.coscomentertainment.com

  • Stop Sending Mass Emails and READ the Guidelines!

      0 comments

    As a publisher I get loads of queries every month and, at present, ALL of them are out of our reading season. However, because I know how hard it is to get a publisher’s attention, I do read each and every one just in case there’s that gem of a book waiting to be found.

    Here’s what I’ve been noticing about queries lately: writers just don’t care about the publisher and only care about being published.

    Let me explain because this “me me me” attitude is hurting you big time.

    I can’t begin to tell you how many queries I get that are pure garbage. Probably around 85%, if not more.

    Each of the automatically rejected had one or more of the following wrong with them:

    - query not properly punctuated or even spelled properly. For example, “i get a lot of queries that look like this. hey, i have this book. it’s about ghosts. wanna publish it?”

    - writers sending in manuscripts when the guidelines clearly state to not do that but to only query first

    - writers sending me queries about books that aren’t even in the genres we publish (i.e. children’s picture books, non-fiction, etc.)

    - writers begging me to publish their book

    - writers not tell me what the book is about in their query but only giving the title and some personal information

    - writers telling me how wonderful their book is but barely telling me what the book is about or even catching my interest

    And, the best of the worst:

    - mass mailings. These are the ones where, as per the CC area in the query’s email, the writer has mass mailed 15+ publishers at once in the hopes someone will bite. Not only does this show extreme laziness, but it shows the writer is utterly desperate. Look, even if you are desperate, don’t show it to a publisher. It’s an immediate turn off. Don’t start your query with “To whom it may concern” or “Dear Publisher.” Queries are to be ALWAYS personalized to whomever or wherever you’re sending it.

    Want to write a good query? The place to start is to be professional in your approach. I’m not even talking about the actual writing of one. You need to have the right attitude. Even if you’re buddy-buddy with a publisher, that should have no bearing on how you query them. Personal relationships and business relationships are completely separate things. Period.

    Then, with your attitude in the right place, FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES. If a publisher wants you to query them a certain way, do it. Don’t take the chance that they’ll look past it. Some publishers do, but most don’t. How you query a publisher says a lot about what you’ll be like to work with and if you can’t follow guidelines or decide to treat the publisher like garbage right from the get-go (and, yes, this has happened to me), then there is no way you’re going to land a book with them.

    Now, to write a proper query–there are a few different ways, but Coscom Entertainment prefers our queries in the following format:

    - proper “to” and “from” addresses on the top of the page
    - proper address to whom you’re querying (i.e. “Dear Mr. Fuchs” or “Dear Acquisitions Editor”)
    - hooking first sentence or two, catching our interest about the rest of your query
    - identification of the book, genre and length
    - synopsis
    - why it’s marketable
    - any personal info about you
    - proper sign off (i.e. Sincerely, Joe Author)

    Failure on the above, save for a few exceptions, will pretty much destroy your chances of getting your book read by us. We got lots to choose from and don’t have time to handhold an author in the basics of querying.

    So if you do any of the things listed above that just drive us up the wall, please stop. You’re only hurting yourself.

  • Canister X Movie Review #6: Batman Forever (1995)

      0 comments

    Click Here to Order from Amazon.com


    Batman Forever (1995)
    Review by A.P. Fuchs

    3 out of 5

    Two Face has been terrorizing Gotham for a while and after executing a terrible sentence at Gotham Circus, he inadvertently changes the life of the Dark Knight forever by setting in motion a chain of events that lead to the birth of Batman’s legendary partner, Robin.

    Continuing in the “double villain” trend as established by Batman Returns, a disgruntled—and stalker-ish—employee of Wayne Industries, Edward Nigma, gets revenge on his boss by becoming the Riddler, and steals his way to the top of the technology enterprise game.

    It’s two-on-two in this third installment of the Batman franchise.

    Riddle me this: what do you get when you cross Adam West and Michael Keaton? You get Val Kilmer’s portrayal of Batman, one who is part serious and part humorous. This is the film that I’ve always viewed as the “transition piece” between the dark Bat flicks done by Tim Burton and the all-out camp-fest that is Batman and Robin.

    Though a bit over the top, the story of Batman Forever is a good one and if you watch it just for that, you’ll highly enjoy it.

    It was the humor that brought this film down.

    First, Batman ain’t funny. He’s so serious and dry he makes Al Gore look like Superman.

    Second, Two Face isn’t funny. Tommy Lee Jones, as much as I enjoy him as an actor, got the character wrong. Two Face is a gangster not another version of the Joker.

    Third, Riddler isn’t all whacky and zany, though by director Joel Schumacher’s choice to cast Jim Carrey in the role, it’s evident he was after Frank Gorshin’s Riddler from the ’60s instead of the comic book Riddler. Jim also got this part shortly after he became super famous so obviously this role was playing to his strength of being a rubber-faced whack job.

    Fourth, though it was a neat thing to add Robin to the mix, Chris O’Donnell was too old, but, I suppose, having a kid running around in an anatomically correct rubber suit would have raised too many questions.

    This film was 50/50 for me. Had its pluses and minuses. I’m going to leave this in the “decide for yourself” category.

    Language warning: Blasphemy

  • Canister X Movie Review #5: Batman Returns (1992)

      0 comments

    Click Here to Order from Amazon.com


    Batman Returns (1992)
    Review by A.P. Fuchs

    3.5 out of 5

    A mysterious “penguin man” surfaces and takes the city by storm, so much so that evil business tycoon Max Shreck, played by Christopher Walken, thinks he can turn Penguin into the city’s new mayor. But Penguin is not all what he seems and he secretly controls the Red Triangle gang, who are wreaking havoc across the city.

    Add to the mix is one Selina Kyle, Shreck’s lowly assistant, er, secretary, who, after a bad night with her boss, becomes Catwoman.

    The bat signal shines and the Dark Knight returns to once again rid Gotham of chaos and restore order.

    Michael Keaton is back as Gotham’s Guardian and brings to the role all the mystery and edge that made the ’89 movie so popular. What’s even better is that this movie actually has Batman in it and the vigilante appears, clad in black armor, more than just four times like in the previous flick.

    Danny DeVito as the Penguin does a great job given what he had to work with. Though the Penguin in this film is not the same as the one in the comics, DeVito still did well portraying a man who was born…a little different.

    Michelle Pfeiffer pulls off the dual role of Selina Kyle/Catwoman nicely. In fact, she plays four distinct roles in this film, all in one character: nerdy Selina, hip Selina, crazy Selina and Catwoman.

    This film is filled with action, darkness and fun, all set in Tim Burton’s eerie Gotham City, which was a character on its own in this film and its predecessor.

    It’s the hokey plot that’s earning this film a lower rating than the previous one. Had the story been better, this movie had the potential to be one of the best superhero flicks ever.

    Language warning: Cursing

  • New site coming for sure

      0 comments

    Been talking to my webmaster and we decided we’re going to transform www.apfuchs.com into a kind of blog-site thing, making it more interactive, more streamlined. I’m happy about this because I enjoy blogging but I’m finding having a million-and-one sites and the idea things are all over the map a pain and uninspiring.

    So you heard it here first. New site coming. Gonna be fun.

  • Vicious Verses and Reanimated Rhymes: Zany Zombie Poetry for the Undead Head Now Available!

      0 comments

    Vicious Verses and Reanimated Rhymes: Zany Zombie Poetry for the Undead Head edited by A.P. Fuchs is now available at the following on-line retailers:

    Paperback:

    Amazon.com
    Amazon.ca
    Amazon.co.uk
    Other On-line Retailers

    eBook:

    Amazon Kindle
    Fictionwise.com
    Drivethruhorror.com

    Synopsis:

    The dead rise. The world dies. Mankind falls and enters Death’s halls.

    Over 90 poems of carnage, hopelessness and despair mixed with oodles of the living dead await you. Featuring poems by W. Bill Czolgosz, Paul A. Freeman, Keith Gouveia, J.H. Hobson, Rich Ristow, Lester Smith, Steve Vernon, Zed Zefram, Zombie Zak and many others, Vicious Verses and Reanimated Rhymes will not only melt your brain . . . it’ll tear out your jugular!

    The last Coscom Entertainment release: The Summer I Died

    For our full list of books, please see: www.coscomentertainment.com

  • Canister X Movie Review #4: Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus (2009)

      0 comments

    Click Here to Order from Amazon.com


    Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus (2009)
    Review by A.P. Fuchs

    2.5 out of 5

    Watched this thing last night.

    Okay, let’s see . . .

    Cool premise. I mean, really, a big shark versus a massive octopus? That just reeks cool.

    The story was more or less solid. Some parts were predictable, especially the “how to get rid of them” part.

    The acting . . . well, aside from Deborah Gibson, who I thought was the most believable in terms of how she presented her character (except when she screwed around with Vic Chao, which seemed really out of the blue), needed lots of work. Seemed forced in a lot of ways, but this is a B-movie we’re talking about so I was willing to not nitpick the acting because I just wanted to see shark vs octopus action.

    The special FX were okay, a 6 or so on a scale of 1-10. Some stuff looked super fake. Others, namely the underwater sequences, looked real. My only issue with the underwater stuff was that you lost all sense of scale because there was nothing to compare these guys to (as compared to when the shark took a huge bite out of the Golden Gate Bridge). However, you did get your sense of scale when the submarines tried to take the shark on.

    The shark vs octopus fight was pretty good. How often do you see a giant octopus wrap its tentacles around a shark’s entire body? I just wish, though, there was the budget to drag it out because the fight was kind of short-lived and was very simple in terms of the “fight moves” from each creature. Likewise, other shots of the creatures throughout the movie were just a glimpse here and there.

    On a fun scale, this gets an 7 out of 10, but my official rating is a 5. I think there was better acting in Transmorphers, and, well, guess I am nitpicking a little.

    Language warning: Cursing and blasphemy

  • Canister X Movie Review #3: Batman (1989)

      0 comments

    Click Here to Order from Amazon.com


    Batman (1989)
    Review by A.P. Fuchs

    4 out of 5

    There are rumors of a six-foot bat in Gotham City. Whispers. Suggestions. Nothing concrete. But all that changes after the Batman confronts Carl Grissom’s men at Axis Chemicals and Grissom’s top hood, Jack Napier, gets dropped into a vat of chemicals, transforming him into the maniacal Joker. Discovering he had been set up by his boss to take a fall at Axis, Joker takes over Grissom’s operation, in turn allowing him to try and take over Gotham City itself, with only the Dark Knight to stop him.

    This was the film that gave us the “movie Batman” we know today: dark and armored. If it wasn’t for director Tim Burton’s gothic and grim vision of crime-ridden Gotham City and its brooding protector, I suspect the edgy superhero movies of today wouldn’t exist.

    Michael Keaton takes on the title role as billionaire playboy Bruce Wayne and his rubber-clad alter ego Batman, delivering one of the greatest Batman performances that many, at the time, hadn’t expected from “Mr. Mom.” And after his memorable line during the opening rooftop scene, “I’m Batman,” from that moment on he had you sold that his version of the Dark Knight meant business and quenches any lingering thought that Batman, thanks to the 1960’s TV series, is a campy superhero.

    Stealing the stage is Jack Nicholson as the Joker. Basically take the Jack from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest and crank it up to 100 and you have the Joker. Nicholson does a brilliant job of blending the serious and twisted Joker while also playing the crazy, laughing machine. I’m sure when Batman: The Animated Series came along, Nicholson’s Joker was the template for Mark Hamill’s performance as the voice of the character. Awesome.

    Danny Elfman’s haunting and lonely score only adds to the movie’s eeriness.

    My only problem with the film was there wasn’t enough Batman. I remember that bothering me as a kid. Batman shows up all of four times in the film, the first being something like only for a minute. Each subsequent time gets progressively longer, thankfully.

    Bold, atmospheric and downright fun, Batman is one for the ages. It was where the modern dark superhero movie started.

    Language warning: Cursing and blasphemy